The "paying for it" line is a bit Daily Mail though...
Oh really?
So me paying a fortune on Moday and being kept behind a rope then another fortune on Tuesday for a "no-touch" half an hour, then a boozy reveller turning up for free and spending 5 hours standing on the stones on Wednesday as a result of a £200,000 annual event subsidy is not something I should moan about?
Is that rather peculiar state of affairs based on Cecil Chubb's Deed of Gift or the unmentionable fact that said boozy reveller et al might kick off citing exclusive spiritual rights of access if asked to give a single penny?
I'm well aware we can't pick and choose how taxes are spent but the above is a particularly unjust juxtaposition I'd have thought.
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 14th August 2014ce 11:30 |
Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Jul 10, 2014, 13:39)- Re: Stonehenge - again! (juamei, Jul 10, 2014, 13:43)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Evergreen Dazed, Jul 10, 2014, 15:51)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Jul 14, 2014, 10:27)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Aug 06, 2014, 12:23)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Aug 11, 2014, 13:05)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 11, 2014, 15:54)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 14, 2014, 09:09)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 14, 2014, 15:41)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Sanctuary, Aug 14, 2014, 21:31)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Sanctuary, Aug 15, 2014, 21:17)
|
|