My point here is no matter the cause it's not ok to make a mockery of one of our best known ancient monuments.
I remember one particular occasion by the WKLB where a bloke had travelled down from Scotland for the day to get the pics he needed, but he couldn't due to several tents being pitched by the facade (?sp) stones, he was distraught, same could be said here.
These are national monuments or they aren't. National monuments don't do days off, and the NT should stop whoring our history for cheap stunts.
The cause is totally irrelevant.
Reply | with quote | Posted by harestonesdown 3rd November 2013ce 01:03 |
Another stunt allowed by the NT. (harestonesdown, Nov 02, 2013, 00:17)- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (PMM, Nov 02, 2013, 08:17)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (nigelswift, Nov 02, 2013, 08:27)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (PMM, Nov 02, 2013, 09:35)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (nigelswift, Nov 02, 2013, 09:55)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Mustard, Nov 02, 2013, 12:39)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Sanctuary, Nov 02, 2013, 14:47)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (harestonesdown, Nov 04, 2013, 02:26)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (jonmor, Nov 02, 2013, 09:40)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Littlestone, Nov 02, 2013, 08:28)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (tjj, Nov 02, 2013, 08:45)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (harestonesdown, Nov 04, 2013, 02:22)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Littlestone, Nov 02, 2013, 09:37)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (moss, Nov 03, 2013, 09:20)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Sanctuary, Nov 03, 2013, 15:08)
|
|