Well, not only is it misuse of a cultural icon there is also a very real danger that it will set a precedent for more ‘additions’ in the future - from both ‘worthy’ causes and causes of the less worthy. The National Trust is way out of line in allowing this and they should not be allowed to do it again.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Littlestone
2nd November 2013ce
08:28 |
Another stunt allowed by the NT. (harestonesdown, Nov 02, 2013, 00:17)- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (PMM, Nov 02, 2013, 08:17)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (nigelswift, Nov 02, 2013, 08:27)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (PMM, Nov 02, 2013, 09:35)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (nigelswift, Nov 02, 2013, 09:55)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Mustard, Nov 02, 2013, 12:39)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Sanctuary, Nov 02, 2013, 14:47)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (harestonesdown, Nov 04, 2013, 02:26)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (jonmor, Nov 02, 2013, 09:40)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Littlestone, Nov 02, 2013, 08:28)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (tjj, Nov 02, 2013, 08:45)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (harestonesdown, Nov 04, 2013, 02:22)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Littlestone, Nov 02, 2013, 09:37)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (moss, Nov 03, 2013, 09:20)
- Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (Sanctuary, Nov 03, 2013, 15:08)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Another stunt allowed by the NT. (PMM)