|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian General Discussion Forum | Start a topic | Search |
 Re: Hill-fort Survey 28 messages | Select a forum: |
Evergreen Dazed wrote: The responsibility in this case lies with the designer of the form, who must restrict the laymans/amateurs options in such a way as to make them meaningful. Actually the form that Juamei linked to above appears to do that pretty well, especially with the supporting notes. There are some terms I'd never heard of, e.g. "lobate", but that potentially makes it educational too (I had to look it up and will now use it in my fieldnotes, just to try to sound clever). I still have the "Cameron with placard" image about this though, I'm too entrenched/cynical to shake that off. Reply | with quote |  9th July 2013ce 21:17 In reply to: Re: Hill-fort Survey (Evergreen Dazed) |
Messages in this topic: |
|