From my own research, I only ever found reference to them falling over naturally due to very shallow holes, as already stated.
Personally, I wouldn't want then re-erected as there is no guarantee they are being re-placed in their correct positions and Arbor Low is still very impressive as it is. In some cases there is an argument for restoration/reconstruction when a place is under threat, but don't see that as being the case here, so my vote is to let sleeping stones lie.
A.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by common era
25th April 2013ce
13:55 |
Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (simondawson, Apr 10, 2013, 14:00)- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (dissolving, Apr 10, 2013, 14:11)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (hedgedruid, Apr 10, 2013, 17:51)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (ocifant, Apr 11, 2013, 06:53)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (CARL, Apr 11, 2013, 07:14)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (ryaner, Apr 24, 2013, 13:52)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (Gwass, Apr 24, 2013, 15:39)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (Spaceship mark, Apr 25, 2013, 14:58)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (harestonesdown)