Nothing historical or 'technical' to add here, just my own feeling: I personally found Arbor Low very powerful as it is (in its present 'clockface' style). I'm a bit torn. I can understand the wish to return it to its original state, but I'm not convinced there's a huge need to, although I can also see that the resultant testing of soil could be very interesting.
There you go. No help at all!
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Incoming Traveller
12th April 2013ce
09:12 |
Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (simondawson, Apr 10, 2013, 14:00)- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (dissolving, Apr 10, 2013, 14:11)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (hedgedruid, Apr 10, 2013, 17:51)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (ocifant, Apr 11, 2013, 06:53)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (CARL, Apr 11, 2013, 07:14)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (ryaner, Apr 24, 2013, 13:52)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (Gwass, Apr 24, 2013, 15:39)
- Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (Spaceship mark, Apr 25, 2013, 14:58)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Arbor Low stone circle - raising of the stones to their original upright position. (Megalithics)