The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian

Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   General Discussion Forum Start a topic | Search
The Modern Antiquarian
Re: Scots/Picts/Celts/Romans/Saxons/etc
137 messages
Select a forum:
Harryshill wrote:
tiompan wrote:
wideford wrote:
1. Until fairly recently the dominant theory was that the Picts were non-IE and therefore the language
2. The union of Scotland by Kenneth MacAlpin is commonly held to be due to his satisfying both Pictish and Gaelic rules of succession
3. Working from a Scottish document now in France it is suggested the union wasn't completed until a lot later, that after Cinaed's death the legitimate successor was murdered and a usurper removed all other potential kings apart from his own lineage (though of course as last of the mormaers of Moray Lulach the Fool, son of MacBeath, was the last legitimate Pictish contender much much later)


1)Katherine Forsyth is quite good for Pictish language studies .Pictish being non IEdates back to at least Zimmer 19th C and is no longer considered tenable .
2) Agree
3) I think you may be referring to the Poppleton manuscript some of which is very useful but other parts e.g. the De Situ Albanie is now considered as accurate as the other medieval histories i.e. inaccurate .



This is subject up until now that I have had no knowledge of at all.

Thank you both for the info.


Get interested in Pictish symbols at your peril , it's worse than Stonehenge and rock art combined .


Reply | with quote
tiompan
Posted by tiompan
4th November 2012ce
20:53

Messages in this topic: