In what way is it ‘irrelevant’? In what way does this thread not ‘have legs’?
Restarting a thread that has diversed (substantially) from the original theme of a thread seems completely (and preferably) legitimate to me.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Littlestone
4th November 2012ce
19:11 |
Neanderthals v Humans (Littlestone, Oct 29, 2012, 22:01)- Re: Neanderthals v Humans (thesweetcheat, Oct 29, 2012, 22:10)
- Re: Neanderthals v Humans (tiompan, Oct 29, 2012, 22:17)
- Re: Neanderthals v Humans (handofdave, Oct 30, 2012, 17:25)
- Re: Neanderthals v Humans (tomwatts, Nov 01, 2012, 07:58)
- Re: Neanderthals v Humans (moss, Nov 08, 2012, 08:42)
- Re: Neanderthals v Humans (Littlestone, Nov 09, 2012, 08:22)
- Re: Neanderthals v Humans (tomwatts, Nov 17, 2012, 22:59)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Scots/Picts/Celts/Romans/Saxons/etc (Harryshill)