bladup wrote: Mustard wrote: bladup wrote: Mustard wrote: bladup wrote:
No i've always said meeting me is the proof.
No. Meeting you might convince me, but it wouldn't be "proof".
You can't prove that, ha ha because it might be!
No, because it couldn't be demonstrated empirically.
You can't beat a bit of living proof though can you, i've enjoyed this little chat and thank you for been the voice of reason, as i like the way you did it without taking anyones side, classy.
It's the word "proof" we're getting stuck on. "Proof" is incontrovertible, and not based on personal, subjective experience. Plenty of Christians believe they have personal "proof" that their god exists.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Mustard 21st September 2012ce 16:38 |
Hillforts & Barrows (Evergreen Dazed, Sep 16, 2012, 11:33)- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (tiompan, Sep 16, 2012, 12:07)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (bladup, Sep 16, 2012, 12:19)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (juamei, Sep 16, 2012, 13:57)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (tjj, Sep 16, 2012, 14:11)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (The Eternal, Sep 16, 2012, 21:52)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (GLADMAN, Sep 24, 2012, 20:07)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (Hob, Oct 01, 2012, 00:24)
|
|