nigelswift wrote: "Creationism can be objectively disproved through the fossil record."
Course it cant (they believe). All those creatures drowned in Noahs flood.
So the two cases are precisely the same.
That's intentionally contrary of you, Nige. There is hard scientific evidence to counter the creationism, if you wish to be pedantic about it. There isn't (and in fairness, probably can't be) hard scientific evidence to counter the belief in reincarnation. The two cases are not precisely the same. Please, in the interests of a harmonious forum, try and accept that your view is not the only true and correct one, and other views may possibly be valid. You are not obliged to agree with them, but try and treat them with a little respect.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Mustard 21st September 2012ce 15:33 |
Hillforts & Barrows (Evergreen Dazed, Sep 16, 2012, 11:33)- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (tiompan, Sep 16, 2012, 12:07)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (bladup, Sep 16, 2012, 12:19)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (juamei, Sep 16, 2012, 13:57)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (tjj, Sep 16, 2012, 14:11)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (The Eternal, Sep 16, 2012, 21:52)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (GLADMAN, Sep 24, 2012, 20:07)
- Re: Hillforts & Barrows (Hob, Oct 01, 2012, 00:24)
|
|