goffik wrote: Nice article! That could almost have been written by someone in HA! :)
Certainly this bit could have been -
"that effort will never wholly succeed until the A303 is removed from the vicinity, and there's the rub."
But we'd have maybe added something he didn't -
"No way can that happen as a tunnel was judged too expensive. Although, just last week the govt. found a comparable sum, £500 million, to build an extra length of tunnel for the High Speed Rail Link under the Chilterns. So it all depends who happens to live where maybe."
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 6th December 2011ce 09:34 |
Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (head-first, Nov 29, 2011, 17:16)- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (tomwatts, Nov 29, 2011, 17:25)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (tjj, Nov 29, 2011, 17:38)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (Mr Hamhead, Nov 29, 2011, 22:59)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (The Sea Cat, Nov 30, 2011, 09:43)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (goffik, Nov 30, 2011, 13:42)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (BuckyE, Dec 02, 2011, 12:59)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (Howburn Digger, Dec 02, 2011, 19:38)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (Sanctuary, Dec 03, 2011, 08:59)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (The Eternal, Dec 04, 2011, 00:26)
- So.... (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2011, 06:59)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (Littlestone, Dec 04, 2011, 10:29)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (SwastikaGirl, Dec 04, 2011, 21:27)
- Re: Should Stonehenge be floodlit? (moss, Dec 06, 2011, 07:51)
|
|