|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Stonehenge Forum | Start a topic | Search |
51 messages | Select a forum: |
Annexus Quam wrote: Well, one shouldn't be so tough on them. I don't know who was personally involved but they knew the pits would be verified in the end once you make such an assertion. But if it was just for the publicity, then they certainly got it. I'm still open to any kind of claim, though. Three unis involved in that claim . I believe they deserve it . No problem with the existence of the pits but they are undated and unexcavated , one can't even be seen from the Heel Stone , in itself is a pretty imaginative use of "alignment " , but their calc is simply wrong in relation to the archaeoastronomy and the loony mid point procession /alignment easily refuted by primary school geometry ,at least that has been forgotten . Reply | with quote |  18th August 2012ce 19:31 In reply to: Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam)2 replies: Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam) Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (jonmor) |
Messages in this topic: |