Well, one shouldn't be so tough on them. I don't know who was personally involved but they knew the pits would be verified in the end once you make such an assertion. But if it was just for the publicity, then they certainly got it. I'm still open to any kind of claim, though.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Annexus Quam
18th August 2012ce
19:00 |
More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (wychburyman, Nov 28, 2011, 15:22)- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (moss, Nov 28, 2011, 15:56)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (wychburyman, Nov 28, 2011, 16:00)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Nov 28, 2011, 17:02)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam, Nov 28, 2011, 19:00)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Nov 28, 2011, 19:14)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Resonox, Nov 28, 2011, 19:27)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Resonox, Nov 28, 2011, 19:27)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam, Nov 28, 2011, 19:58)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Aug 19, 2014, 21:57)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Dave1982, Nov 08, 2014, 11:11)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (juamei, Nov 29, 2011, 16:34)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (BuckyE, Dec 02, 2011, 13:49)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Sanctuary, Nov 08, 2014, 11:26)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan)