Here's a ticklish question I can't get my head round: If 3 points in a straight line are insufficient to suggest intentionality then are two such instances which share a common point any more likely to do so?
And another question: are there any other cases where one of the points is below the horizon (as here) but where intentionality is nevertheless postulated (dowsing manuals excepted).
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
29th November 2011ce
07:16 |
More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (wychburyman, Nov 28, 2011, 15:22)- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (moss, Nov 28, 2011, 15:56)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (wychburyman, Nov 28, 2011, 16:00)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Nov 28, 2011, 17:02)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam, Nov 28, 2011, 19:00)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Nov 28, 2011, 19:14)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Resonox, Nov 28, 2011, 19:27)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Resonox, Nov 28, 2011, 19:27)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam, Nov 28, 2011, 19:58)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Aug 19, 2014, 21:57)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Dave1982, Nov 08, 2014, 11:11)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (juamei, Nov 29, 2011, 16:34)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (BuckyE, Dec 02, 2011, 13:49)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Sanctuary, Nov 08, 2014, 11:26)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (baza)