Of course I totally agree with you on that (unless the pit where the stone was originally stood is still somewhere under it!). Yet, interesting all the same that they are coming up with those theories (and why) if Mike Parker-Pearson (?) is still doing the excavations (for better or worse). In good-reasoned debate more than from the theory itself is where one always learns something.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Annexus Quam
28th November 2011ce
19:58 |
More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (wychburyman, Nov 28, 2011, 15:22)- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (moss, Nov 28, 2011, 15:56)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (wychburyman, Nov 28, 2011, 16:00)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Nov 28, 2011, 17:02)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam, Nov 28, 2011, 19:00)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Nov 28, 2011, 19:14)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Resonox, Nov 28, 2011, 19:27)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Resonox, Nov 28, 2011, 19:27)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam, Nov 28, 2011, 19:58)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Aug 19, 2014, 21:57)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Dave1982, Nov 08, 2014, 11:11)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (juamei, Nov 29, 2011, 16:34)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (BuckyE, Dec 02, 2011, 13:49)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Sanctuary, Nov 08, 2014, 11:26)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan)