moss wrote: wychburyman wrote:
Greetings,
Actually I did put a longer article on news about
this.... http://www.themodernantiquaria[...]onehenge_and_its_environs.html
but if you read Tiompans comments on the subject, he says 'phooy' to the latest Stonehenge findings, they are way out. Still it is interesting and goes back to those postholes in the carpark as well.....
All I can say cynically is that if you do an archaeological survey anywhere near Stonehenge is that you have to justify it by an exciting headline ....
Thank you, very interesting, I would imagine they are under pressure to satisfy their funding masters, but I'll still stick to the science and the professionals.
Reply | with quote | Posted by wychburyman 28th November 2011ce 16:00 |
More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (wychburyman, Nov 28, 2011, 15:22)- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (moss, Nov 28, 2011, 15:56)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (wychburyman, Nov 28, 2011, 16:00)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Nov 28, 2011, 17:02)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam, Nov 28, 2011, 19:00)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Nov 28, 2011, 19:14)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Resonox, Nov 28, 2011, 19:27)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Resonox, Nov 28, 2011, 19:27)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Annexus Quam, Nov 28, 2011, 19:58)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (tiompan, Aug 19, 2014, 21:57)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Dave1982, Nov 08, 2014, 11:11)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (juamei, Nov 29, 2011, 16:34)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (BuckyE, Dec 02, 2011, 13:49)
- Re: More evidence on Stonehenge/Solar connections (Sanctuary, Nov 08, 2014, 11:26)
|
|