Sanctuary wrote: nigelswift wrote: Hey Mr Sanctuary, good for you for taking the moral high ground about not arguing but could you clarify what is your position on the Silbury moral high ground?
In other words, is it OK to walk straight past the notices asking people not to climb it - and to climb it? Where do you stand on the issue?! ;)
You may wish to stir the pot further Nigel but you're not fooling anyone. I certainly have no wish to take part in any tit for tat vendetta.
Why is asking a question tit-for -tat?(TY Nigel for asking...but now you'll be tarred with the same brush as me..."an argumentative so and so"..something I won't deny about myself because I refuse to just swallow any old guff dished out because it is "our ancestral right"...not and never will be a valid answer to debate.)
I can't understand why there are vendetta claims and refusals to answer because it is a viewpoint at odds with others, when it is only offering another side to the debate....
Are there any neutrals around? What would be their point in posting, "I agree with A because I see his point of view but I also agree with B because I see his point too!"....gets us no nearer a mutually acceptable solution.
My point is...it is wrong to climb a hill where that action is prohibited...just because there is no-one to police the prohibition and it is seen as an ancestral right from the climber's beliefs and that belief is at variance with other peoples' beliefs....as well as IMO being a wanton act of vandalism as the prohibition is there to preserve....not to deny beliefs....but that is only MY belief(others agree as others disagree)...but I'll repeat..if we don't preserve..there will soon be nothing there to preserve for our progeny....what will they think of their ancestors?
Reply | with quote | Posted by Resonox 28th February 2011ce 09:14 |
Developments at Avebury (Littlestone, Feb 14, 2011, 16:03)- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 14, 2011, 16:43)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Littlestone, Feb 14, 2011, 19:10)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (goffik, Feb 15, 2011, 00:08)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (goffik, Feb 15, 2011, 00:08)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 15, 2011, 00:18)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (goffik, Feb 15, 2011, 00:23)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (goffik, Feb 15, 2011, 00:23)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (megadread, Feb 15, 2011, 01:14)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 15, 2011, 08:52)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 15, 2011, 09:01)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 15, 2011, 09:05)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 15, 2011, 09:24)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (tjj, Feb 16, 2011, 01:23)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 08:15)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (tjj, Feb 16, 2011, 10:39)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 11:47)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 16, 2011, 11:58)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (tjj, Feb 16, 2011, 13:10)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 13:15)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:15)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 14:21)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:25)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 14:30)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:36)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 14:47)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:50)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 16:44)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 16, 2011, 17:01)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 18:13)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 16, 2011, 18:21)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (faerygirl, Feb 16, 2011, 20:41)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (nigelswift, Feb 16, 2011, 14:30)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 16, 2011, 14:38)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:03)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 16, 2011, 15:07)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 16, 2011, 19:11)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 16, 2011, 19:19)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 17, 2011, 09:56)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (sleeptowin, Feb 17, 2011, 16:40)
- Benches (Littlestone, Feb 17, 2011, 20:14)
- The worst kind (Littlestone, Feb 18, 2011, 13:51)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Littlestone, Feb 19, 2011, 20:56)
- QR Codes (Littlestone, Feb 25, 2011, 20:26)
- Re: QR Codes (ocifant, Feb 25, 2011, 20:55)
- Re: QR Codes (tjj, Feb 25, 2011, 21:54)
- Re: QR Codes (thesweetcheat, Feb 25, 2011, 22:08)
- Re: QR Codes (juamei, Feb 26, 2011, 13:28)
- Re: QR Codes (ocifant, Feb 26, 2011, 19:51)
- Re: QR Codes (tjj, Feb 26, 2011, 20:17)
- Re: QR Codes (megadread, Feb 26, 2011, 23:43)
- Re: QR Codes (goffik, Feb 27, 2011, 10:04)
- Re: QR Codes (megadread, Feb 27, 2011, 17:23)
- Re: QR Codes (Littlestone, Feb 27, 2011, 19:03)
- Re: QR Codes (megadread, Feb 27, 2011, 19:38)
- Re: QR Codes (Resonox, Feb 28, 2011, 06:13)
- Re: QR Codes (Sanctuary, Feb 28, 2011, 07:11)
- Re: QR Codes (Resonox, Feb 28, 2011, 07:19)
- Re: QR Codes (Sanctuary, Feb 28, 2011, 07:42)
- Re: QR Codes (nigelswift, Feb 28, 2011, 07:54)
- Re: QR Codes (Sanctuary, Feb 28, 2011, 08:04)
- Re: QR Codes (goffik, Feb 28, 2011, 08:07)
- Re: QR Codes (nigelswift, Feb 28, 2011, 08:43)
- Re: QR Codes (Resonox, Feb 28, 2011, 09:14)
- Re: QR Codes (Resonox, Feb 28, 2011, 08:09)
- Re: QR Codes (tiompan, Feb 28, 2011, 09:28)
- Re: QR Codes (nigelswift, Feb 27, 2011, 09:00)
- Re: QR Codes (goffik, Feb 25, 2011, 23:41)
- Re: QR Codes (Littlestone, Feb 26, 2011, 12:08)
- Re: QR Codes (moss, Feb 26, 2011, 14:08)
- Re: QR Codes (tjj, Mar 02, 2011, 19:11)
- Re: QR Codes (Rockrich, Feb 27, 2011, 20:05)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Mar 04, 2011, 09:36)
- In defence of Avebury (Littlestone, Mar 06, 2011, 13:45)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (neighbourofthedrude, Mar 06, 2011, 16:11)
- Developments at Avebury... or not... (Littlestone, May 28, 2011, 10:08)
- Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (Littlestone, Jul 29, 2011, 15:11)
- Re: Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (Sanctuary, Jul 29, 2011, 15:36)
- Re: Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (thesweetcheat, Jul 29, 2011, 15:48)
- Re: Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (Lubin, Jul 29, 2011, 16:57)
- Re: Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (goffik, Jul 29, 2011, 20:58)
- Barbour Shepherd (VBB, Jul 30, 2011, 06:59)
- New stone erected in the Kennet Avenue! (Littlestone, Jul 31, 2011, 14:02)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (hedgeling, Dec 19, 2011, 21:15)
- The Cellar at the Cove (Littlestone, Apr 18, 2012, 17:12)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Littlestone, Jul 10, 2012, 12:04)
- Future management of Avebury (Littlestone, Jul 31, 2012, 12:08)
- The Avebury Parish Traffic Plan (Littlestone, Feb 19, 2013, 13:17)
|
|