nigelswift wrote: VBB wrote: The WHS is supposed to take priority and one wonders what on earth is going on?
Yes. The WHS ought to take priority.
Every time it doesn't a little bit more deterioration is bequeathed to posterity.
It's strange, it looks like Stonehenge is finally being put back to the way it ought to be whereas Avebury is subject to incremental loss. Both processes can't be right, in the same WHS.
When you think about it in geographic terms - in the last three years Avebury’s local authority planners have granted permission for the development of three sites on the northern, western, and eastern thresholds of the henge in addition to the change of use creating a food outlet which will open in the very centre. The northern approach to the henge is now dominated by housing, as you guys illustrated so vividly, in addition to which a large house is replacing a bungalow at the western end of the High Street, and to the east another house will replace a bungalow on Green Street, and directly in front of everyone entering the henge by road from the south will be the food outlet at the centre of the henge.
If one can’t rely on Wiltshire Council planners to limit the impact of developments to protect something so special and unique it is granted the status of being a World Heritage Site, or expect the National Trust to see the hypocrisy in a conservation body opening a food outlet in the centre of the largest stone circle in the world whilst being party to a £multi-million attempt to remove similar facilities to a more respectful distance from dare I suggest a smaller diameter and less ancient stone circle at Stonehenge - then what next?
Reply | with quote | Posted by VBB 22nd February 2011ce 17:11 |
Developments at Avebury (Littlestone, Feb 14, 2011, 16:03)- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 14, 2011, 16:43)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Littlestone, Feb 14, 2011, 19:10)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (goffik, Feb 15, 2011, 00:08)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (goffik, Feb 15, 2011, 00:08)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 15, 2011, 00:18)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (goffik, Feb 15, 2011, 00:23)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (goffik, Feb 15, 2011, 00:23)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (megadread, Feb 15, 2011, 01:14)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 15, 2011, 08:52)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 15, 2011, 09:01)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 15, 2011, 09:05)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 15, 2011, 09:24)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (tjj, Feb 16, 2011, 01:23)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 08:15)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (tjj, Feb 16, 2011, 10:39)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 11:47)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 16, 2011, 11:58)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (tjj, Feb 16, 2011, 13:10)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 13:15)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:15)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 14:21)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:25)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 14:30)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:36)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 14:47)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:50)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (The Sea Cat, Feb 16, 2011, 16:44)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 16, 2011, 17:01)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 18:13)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 16, 2011, 18:21)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (faerygirl, Feb 16, 2011, 20:41)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (nigelswift, Feb 16, 2011, 14:30)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 16, 2011, 14:38)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Resonox, Feb 16, 2011, 14:03)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 16, 2011, 15:07)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 16, 2011, 19:11)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Feb 16, 2011, 19:19)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Sanctuary, Feb 17, 2011, 09:56)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (sleeptowin, Feb 17, 2011, 16:40)
- Benches (Littlestone, Feb 17, 2011, 20:14)
- The worst kind (Littlestone, Feb 18, 2011, 13:51)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Littlestone, Feb 19, 2011, 20:56)
- QR Codes (Littlestone, Feb 25, 2011, 20:26)
- Re: QR Codes (ocifant, Feb 25, 2011, 20:55)
- Re: QR Codes (tjj, Feb 25, 2011, 21:54)
- Re: QR Codes (goffik, Feb 25, 2011, 23:41)
- Re: QR Codes (Littlestone, Feb 26, 2011, 12:08)
- Re: QR Codes (moss, Feb 26, 2011, 14:08)
- Re: QR Codes (tjj, Mar 02, 2011, 19:11)
- Re: QR Codes (Rockrich, Feb 27, 2011, 20:05)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (jackyboy, Mar 04, 2011, 09:36)
- In defence of Avebury (Littlestone, Mar 06, 2011, 13:45)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (neighbourofthedrude, Mar 06, 2011, 16:11)
- Developments at Avebury... or not... (Littlestone, May 28, 2011, 10:08)
- Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (Littlestone, Jul 29, 2011, 15:11)
- Re: Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (Sanctuary, Jul 29, 2011, 15:36)
- Re: Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (thesweetcheat, Jul 29, 2011, 15:48)
- Re: Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (Lubin, Jul 29, 2011, 16:57)
- Re: Unemployed layabouts leave marks on Avebury stones (goffik, Jul 29, 2011, 20:58)
- Barbour Shepherd (VBB, Jul 30, 2011, 06:59)
- New stone erected in the Kennet Avenue! (Littlestone, Jul 31, 2011, 14:02)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (hedgeling, Dec 19, 2011, 21:15)
- The Cellar at the Cove (Littlestone, Apr 18, 2012, 17:12)
- Re: Developments at Avebury (Littlestone, Jul 10, 2012, 12:04)
- Future management of Avebury (Littlestone, Jul 31, 2012, 12:08)
- The Avebury Parish Traffic Plan (Littlestone, Feb 19, 2013, 13:17)
|
|