Littlestone wrote: goffik wrote: I, for one, know of no such "conspiracy". As far as I'm aware, anyone who has been banned has done so because they've persistently flouted the forum's guidelines. So unless you do that, I doubt any person would have the clout to get anyone else banned! :)
G x
By the way, in the unlikely event that anyone thinks I’m an ed, I’d like to state publicly that I’m not (although if such a vacancy occurred I hope they’ll keep me in mind :–)
That could be a double bluff to protect your anonymity though. :S
Reply | with quote | Posted by Mustard 28th October 2010ce 12:56 |
EH image copyright (Hob, Oct 21, 2010, 21:40)- Re: EH image copyright (Hob, Oct 21, 2010, 22:33)
- So are EH claiming the image rights to this? (nigelswift, Oct 22, 2010, 10:48)
- Re: EH image copyright (Jane, Oct 22, 2010, 13:39)
- Re: EH image copyright (Rhiannon, Oct 23, 2010, 06:10)
- Re: EH image copyright (goffik, Oct 23, 2010, 16:27)
- Re: EH image copyright (Rhiannon, Oct 23, 2010, 16:51)
- Re: EH image copyright (megadread, Oct 24, 2010, 01:18)
- Re: EH image copyright (nigelswift, Oct 24, 2010, 02:24)
- Re: EH image copyright (megadread, Oct 24, 2010, 02:26)
- Re: EH image copyright (megadread, Oct 24, 2010, 02:30)
- Re: OT EI (megadread, Oct 25, 2010, 23:04)
- Re: OT EI (megadread, Oct 28, 2010, 00:06)
- Re: OT EI (Sanctuary, Oct 28, 2010, 06:07)
- Re: OT EI (goffik, Oct 28, 2010, 06:38)
- Re: OT EI (Littlestone, Oct 28, 2010, 10:57)
- Re: OT EI (Mustard, Oct 28, 2010, 12:56)
- Re: OT EI (moss, Oct 28, 2010, 06:27)
- Re: EH image copyright (The Eternal, Oct 23, 2010, 23:50)
|
|