The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian

Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Silbury Hill Forum Start a topic | Search
Silbury Hill
Re: hmmm.
194 messages
Select a forum:
Mustard wrote:
nigelswift wrote:
At Stonehenge they COULD stop shits clambering on top of the stones.

Nigel, stop looking down your nose at everyone, eh? There's no reason why you can't express your desire for keeping the stones people-free without the need to be so bloody vitriolic and bitter about it. I remember... just off the top of my head... at least one reference in TMA to Julian Cope climbing on a stone. Is he a "shit" too?


Mustard wrote:
...bloody vitriolic...
.

That's enough Mustard, I've asked you to watch your language (and by extension, how you address others on this thread) so perhaps you should close down for the rest of the evening and reflect on what you say and how you say it.

Thanks.

LS


Reply | with quote
Littlestone
Posted by Littlestone
20th July 2010ce
19:04

In reply to:

Re: hmmm. (Mustard)

1 reply:

Re: hmmm. (Mustard)

Messages in this topic: