Deepinder Cheema wrote: That really is bad form.
I see a swathe of Cod Ladybird book of Archaeology in the Mail, and a helpful image of Stonehenge to remind readers what it looks like.
Ah, the traitor isn't actually on the members list, my ass is covered after reading the t&c's. : )
Phew was really worried for a minute there, is pointing the finger at a non specified non member cause for a ban as they have no recourse here, nothing in the t&c's. :/
Don't suppose there's anything stopping them joining and commenting.
This news was supposed to be under wraps until feb 2010 when the Stonehenge Riverside Project publishes.
Is it standard archaeological practice to leak other peoples discoveries to the gutter press these days?
I despair.
This topic is locked | Posted by megadread 3rd October 2009ce 06:37 |
bluehenge and a despicable leak (megadread, Oct 03, 2009, 01:55)- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (Deepinder Cheema, Oct 03, 2009, 03:39)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (megadread, Oct 03, 2009, 06:37)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (Rhiannon, Oct 03, 2009, 09:05)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (dodge one, Oct 03, 2009, 16:21)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (Psychostevouk, Oct 03, 2009, 19:46)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (drewbhoy, Oct 04, 2009, 00:13)
- Re: bluehenge and a despicable leak (moss, Oct 04, 2009, 13:25)
|
|