Cheema Deepinder wrote: I dannae think in civil law trespassers can be prosecuted (I suppose they can be sued). This berk is appealling against his own application to develop the site - which has been granted? I am reading this correct??
What does he want to do with the planning permission that he has obtained?
Speculate, like the OIC with the WWII 'Black Building'
Reply | with quote | Posted by wideford 1st August 2009ce 14:37 |
Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Seventhorn Inn, Jul 25, 2009, 13:29)- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Amberlady, Jul 27, 2009, 21:18)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (megadread, Jul 28, 2009, 00:07)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Rhiannon, Jul 28, 2009, 07:58)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (goffik, Jul 28, 2009, 09:57)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Cheema Deepinder, Aug 01, 2009, 14:35)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (wideford, Aug 01, 2009, 14:37)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 00:28)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 00:32)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 00:43)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Aug 01, 2012, 11:05)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Sep 15, 2012, 11:29)
- Re: Witch Burial Site Under Threat (Simon Crook, Nov 08, 2012, 18:25)
|
|