This is completely off the top of my head so...
The sarsens started as a 'blanket' of stone.
With Africa crashing into Europe and the formation of the Downs - The chalk being pushed up to the surface by the ripples that crossed Europe from that crash (Starting with the lifting of the Alps) The sarsen was lifted to the surface with the Chalk.
This process and further natural process's broke the Sarsen down into smaller pieces. Local prevailing conditions would then condition how small they were broken..
Point being..
Isn't it likly that the dimensions of the stone would be similar in any given area, seeing as the forces applied to them would be similar?.
Tony
Reply | with quote | Posted by tonyh 7th July 2009ce 19:13 |
The Blue Stone Enigma (Gwass, Jun 23, 2009, 17:05)- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Gwass, Jun 23, 2009, 17:28)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (moss, Jun 24, 2009, 06:26)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Pete G, Jun 24, 2009, 10:35)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (sleeptowin, Jun 24, 2009, 15:57)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (megadread, Jun 24, 2009, 16:45)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (tonyh, Jun 24, 2009, 17:38)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (GordonP, Jun 30, 2009, 20:32)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (tonyh, Jun 30, 2009, 20:51)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Pete G, Jun 30, 2009, 21:32)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (megadread, Jun 30, 2009, 23:16)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (goffik, Jul 01, 2009, 10:06)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (tonyh, Jul 23, 2009, 15:16)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Pete G, Jun 25, 2009, 02:35)
- Re: The Blue Stone Enigma (Rolling Ronnie, Jul 03, 2009, 10:33)
- Stonehenge: Merlin's magic Stones (Littlestone, Jul 21, 2009, 21:01)
|
|