An article suggests that some of the original architects (of a VC not the stones!) have been invited to submit new plans. What I don't understand is why DCMS are employing these people at heaven alone knows how much when it is supposed to be a temporary building. Isn't a structure off the peg ideal to save some cash that can be put into the longer term building?
Or is it DCMS has no intention of ever moving?
 Reply | with quote | Posted by VenerableBottyBurp
27th January 2009ce
16:27 |
Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (VenerableBottyBurp, Jan 27, 2009, 16:27)- Re: Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (baza, Jan 27, 2009, 18:17)
- Re: Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (Pete G, Jul 22, 2009, 14:07)
- Re: Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (baza, Jul 23, 2009, 08:41)
- Re: Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (VBB, Jul 24, 2009, 08:05)
|
|
Head To Head 
Top of page