Pete G wrote: VenerableBottyBurp wrote: An article suggests that some of the original architects (of a VC not the stones!) have been invited to submit new plans. What I don't understand is why DCMS are employing these people at heaven alone knows how much when it is supposed to be a temporary building. Isn't a structure off the peg ideal to save some cash that can be put into the longer term building?
Or is it DCMS has no intention of ever moving?
wasn't the current VC meant to be temporary?
I do believe you right Pete..
Tony
Reply | with quote | Posted by tonyh 22nd July 2009ce 16:17 |
Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (VenerableBottyBurp, Jan 27, 2009, 16:27)- Re: Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (baza, Jan 27, 2009, 18:17)
- Re: Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (Pete G, Jul 22, 2009, 14:07)
- Re: Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (tonyh, Jul 22, 2009, 16:17)
- Re: Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (baza, Jul 23, 2009, 08:41)
- Re: Stonehenge Visitor Centre Design (VBB, Jul 24, 2009, 08:05)
|
|