I totally agree, it's got rather out of hand considering we're largely on the same side.
I think we should just get used to tidying up, and try and do it in a spirit of respect for the site. I mean if people have always left things, then there were always people to tidy them up afterwards, and maybe they expected to have to do it. Maybe if people visited these places more than once they'd end up removing their own stuff.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Rhiannon 30th June 2007ce 09:12 |
Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 25, 2007, 15:18)- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tiompan, Jun 25, 2007, 16:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Hob, Jun 25, 2007, 17:18)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 26, 2007, 11:26)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 26, 2007, 14:45)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 26, 2007, 23:14)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tomwatts, Jun 27, 2007, 14:57)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 27, 2007, 21:24)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (FourWinds, Jun 28, 2007, 05:51)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 28, 2007, 06:07)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (ocifant, Jun 28, 2007, 06:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tuesday, Jun 28, 2007, 08:41)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 18:04)
- New Code (nigelswift, Jun 28, 2007, 11:52)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 18:05)
- Re: New Code (FourWinds, Jun 29, 2007, 19:24)
- Re: New Code (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 19:27)
- Re: New Code (moss, Jun 30, 2007, 09:08)
- Re: New Code (Rhiannon, Jun 30, 2007, 09:12)
- Re: New Code (BuckyE, Jun 29, 2007, 23:05)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 29, 2007, 15:27)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Vybik Jon, Sep 17, 2012, 14:26)
|
|