Forums | Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited)

The Modern Antiquarian

Home	Latest Posts	Forums	Maps	Help

Browse Sites	News	Blog	Contributors	The Books

Head To Head

The Modern Antiquarian

Silbaby Forum

Start a topic | Search

Silbaby

Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited)

39 messages

Select a forum:

164m. is quite a close fit and wouldn't need much jiggling to form a better fit. If it's over the hill, and out of sight, it could be an error

Actually, I take it back, an error of 164 m in a mile would make them lousy surveyors, hill or no hill. A few sticks and a bit of string would get you much closer than that.

Reply | with quote

Posted by nigelswift
4th December 2006ce
19:11

In reply to:

Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter)

Messages in this topic:

Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited)

(tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 09:56)

Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 11:07)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 11:09)
  - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 11:37)
    - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 13:47)
      - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 15:50)
      - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (moss, Dec 04, 2006, 16:25)
        Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 17:17)
  - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 23:11)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 11:28)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 16:33)
  - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 16:55)
    - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 17:15)
      - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 17:45)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 17:47)
  - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (fitzcoraldo, Dec 04, 2006, 18:12)
  - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 18:21)
    - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 18:59)
      - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 19:05)
        Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 19:24)
        Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 19:27)
      - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 19:11)
    - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 19:11)
      - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 19:26)
      - Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 19:27)
        Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 19:43)
        Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 19:49)
        Re: Maps (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 19:56)
        Re: Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 20:03)
        Re: Maps (fitzcoraldo, Dec 04, 2006, 20:48)
        Re: Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 20:57)
        Re: Maps (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 21:30)
        Re: Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 21:33)
        Re: GPS (baza, Dec 04, 2006, 21:53)
        Re: GPS (baza, Dec 04, 2006, 21:59)
        Re: GPS (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 22:15)
        Re: GPS (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 22:22)
Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (fitzcoraldo, Dec 04, 2006, 11:21)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 11:51)

Terms & Conditions | Home | Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Top of page