Hi, thanks for that.
You mentioned 4 points. Which did you mean? I was only thinking about three - the S-S-S alignment (though as a separate issue, the view of WKLB from Silbaby seems particularly impressive IMO).
I'm not "convinced" about it being intentional either. I was just posing a humble question.... does "very accurate" signify a heightened likelihood? ;)
In musing about this elsewhere I've come up with a further possible dimension - literally. See this - Silbury from the Sanctuary, with Silbaby hidden by the trees - http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/19965
Silbaby is lower than Silbury obviously - but what about Silbury 2? Would the Sanctuary and the top of Silbury and the top of Silbury 2 all be in a line? Not a two dimentional exact alignment but a three dimensional one....
Aren't the chances it is "chance" reducing dramatically?
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 4th December 2006ce 11:07 |
Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 09:56)- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 11:07)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 11:09)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 11:28)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 16:33)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 17:47)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (fitzcoraldo, Dec 04, 2006, 18:12)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 18:21)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 18:59)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 19:11)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (StoneLifter, Dec 04, 2006, 19:26)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (nigelswift, Dec 04, 2006, 19:27)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 19:43)
- Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 19:49)
- Re: Maps (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 19:56)
- Re: Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 20:03)
- Re: Maps (fitzcoraldo, Dec 04, 2006, 20:48)
- Re: Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 20:57)
- Re: Maps (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 21:30)
- Re: Maps (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 21:33)
- Re: GPS (baza, Dec 04, 2006, 21:53)
- Re: GPS (baza, Dec 04, 2006, 21:59)
- Re: GPS (Pete G, Dec 04, 2006, 22:15)
- Re: GPS (tiompan, Dec 04, 2006, 22:22)
- Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) (fitzcoraldo, Dec 04, 2006, 11:21)
|
|