The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian

Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   General Discussion Forum Start a topic | Search
The Modern Antiquarian
Re: Sites...but no info
133 messages
Select a forum:
Hello again

Apologies accepted on the name Goffik. However:

< whatisthat wrote:
Looking forward to the answer to this one.

Not sure there is one. >

Utter rubbish. There are obviously reasons why the editor has put Disputed Antiquity signs on them all. The individual concerned took time out to go through each site and labeled each one accordingly. It was meticulous. Hence there is a reason. The person thought it through and labeled them due to a particular bias or loss of logic. It’s quite simple. Exactly that person did such a thing is an anomaly. As whatisthat enquired quite politely:

< Looking forward to the answer to this one >

It would be nice to know, so then I can at least ensure that any cited parameters regarding the placement of holy wells here are maintained.

Many thanks - SG


Reply | with quote
Posted by SwastikaGirl
29th September 2006ce
16:02

In reply to:

Re: Sites...but no info (goffik)

1 reply:

Re: Sites...but no info (goffik)

Messages in this topic: