|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Toor Forum | Start a topic | Search |
27 messages | Select a forum: |
FourWinds wrote: This stone (one of many at Castleruddery) shows that they can't be for splitting the stone as they run down two sides. You justt wouldn't split such a small stone in that way This may add a bit of fuel to the debate: http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/51033 Item no. 228 in the Arch. inventory of Co Louth "At least ten cup and ring devices and a chaeqered type motif occur on a rock outcrop." There were at least 20 cups but not cup and ring devices. There could be more, but some particularly bollickey bullocks weren't too happy that we were in their field. Andy Reply | with quote |  11th September 2006ce 22:23 In reply to: Re: Heymonheyehgorrennypikchaz? (FourWinds) |
Messages in this topic: |
|