The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian

Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Stonehenge and its Environs Forum Start a topic | Search
Stonehenge and its Environs
Re: The bluestone debate
390 messages
Select a forum:
tiompan wrote:
tonyh wrote:


Talking of vegetation. It's not just the ground that has to been considered. moving a load through brushwood or woodland would be extremely difficult..

Tony


Good point . Not often considered .


Perfectly valid point. In west Wales we are referring now to at least 20 different sources for the bluestones (Darvill's recent talk to Soc of Ant) dotted about all over S and W Wales. We are not talking about open chalk downlands here. We are talking about JUNGLE!! Bogs, slippery river banks, incredibly dense woodlands. Instead of carrying on a fascinating dialogue about technology, might it not save everybody a lot of intellectual effort if we just get this question out of the way first: how likely is it that Neolithic tribesmen would have even attempted to collect stones from at least 20 different locations in a densely-wooded terrain with deep river valleys, steep slopes, and boggy ground here, there and everywhere?


Reply | with quote
Posted by mountainman
18th November 2008ce
19:03

In reply to:

Re: The bluestone debate (tiompan)

1 reply:

Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift)

Messages in this topic: