>> We know the circles were laid out using 345 triangles - Thom adequately demonstrated that.
We know that this is a good possibility, not necessarily a fact.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by FourWinds
21st February 2006ce
13:00 |
oooooh nice!!! (wolfnighthunter, Feb 20, 2006, 19:33)- Re: oooooh nice!!! (StoneLifter, Feb 20, 2006, 19:35)
- Re: oooooh nice!!! (Rockrich, Feb 20, 2006, 20:41)
- Re: oooooh nice!!! (fitzcoraldo, Feb 21, 2006, 09:22)
- Re: oooooh nice!!! (rockartuk, Feb 21, 2006, 10:56)
- Re: oooooh nice!!! (StoneLifter, Feb 21, 2006, 11:07)
- Re: oooooh nice!!! (FourWinds, Feb 21, 2006, 13:00)
- Re: oooooh nice!!! (Rockrich, Feb 21, 2006, 16:09)
- Re: and another big ooooooooh!!! for rockandy (wolfnighthunter, Feb 23, 2006, 17:52)
- Re: and another big ooooooooh!!! for rockandy (FourWinds, Feb 23, 2006, 17:55)
- Re: and another big ooooooooh!!! for rockandy (wolfnighthunter, Feb 23, 2006, 17:59)
- Re: and another big ooooooooh!!! for rockandy (FourWinds, Feb 23, 2006, 18:06)
- Re: and another big ooooooooh!!! for rockandy (wolfnighthunter, Feb 23, 2006, 18:39)
- Re: and another big ooooooooh!!! for rockandy (FourWinds, Feb 23, 2006, 20:39)
- Whoops (FourWinds, Feb 23, 2006, 20:44)
- Ah, but... (Hob, Feb 24, 2006, 00:54)
- Re: Ah, but... (Rockrich, Feb 24, 2006, 07:53)
- Re: Ah, but... (BigSweetie, Feb 24, 2006, 10:50)
- Re: And a bloody big wooohooo for Hob.. (wolfnighthunter, Feb 24, 2006, 17:37)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: oooooh nice!!! (StoneLifter)