Minus an unknown amount to allow for the pre-existing slope of Waden Hill underneath. Saying that it does seem to be an excessive amount of spoil from a smallish tunnel.
Jim.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by jimit
12th January 2006ce
13:49 |
Silbaby in the Fortean Times (suave harv, Jan 09, 2006, 13:08)- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (StoneLifter, Jan 09, 2006, 15:23)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (PeterH, Jan 09, 2006, 19:55)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (follow that cow, Jan 10, 2006, 15:30)
- Out of interest... (embryonomore, Jan 11, 2006, 09:26)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (Caratacus, Jan 11, 2006, 20:53)
- Silbaby Updates (Pete G, Jan 11, 2006, 21:22)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (nigelswift, Jan 12, 2006, 09:37)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (dee, Jun 19, 2006, 12:20)
- Another pic? (Pete G, Jun 29, 2006, 14:44)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (nigelswift)