It says Pete G made the discovery, there's two pictures, one from the air. It says it's not definite until it's examined properly but if it's real then it's one of the most 'remarkable discoveries by an ameteur prehistorian in recent years'. It says if it's a natural mound, it could have been the inspiration for Silbury.
It also says some have said it could be a windmill base or Victorian folly. So they're saying "a very interesting find, but no firm facts as yet".
It gives a link to Pete's site too. All good stuff I reckon!
 Reply | with quote | Posted by suave harv
9th January 2006ce
18:34 |
Silbaby in the Fortean Times (suave harv, Jan 09, 2006, 13:08)- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (StoneLifter, Jan 09, 2006, 15:23)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (suave harv, Jan 09, 2006, 18:34)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (PeterH, Jan 09, 2006, 19:55)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (follow that cow, Jan 10, 2006, 15:30)
- Out of interest... (embryonomore, Jan 11, 2006, 09:26)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (Caratacus, Jan 11, 2006, 20:53)
- Silbaby Updates (Pete G, Jan 11, 2006, 21:22)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (nigelswift, Jan 12, 2006, 09:37)
- Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (dee, Jun 19, 2006, 12:20)
- Another pic? (Pete G, Jun 29, 2006, 14:44)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Silbaby in the Fortean Times (StoneLifter)