Probably this thread will get subverted like a lot of others recently but maybe it's worth a try.
Was just wondering what studies have been done on identifying the 'original' position of the fallen stones at Stonehenge? And putting aside the argument of whether or not they should ever be restored to their original positions, is it known a) where all the fallen stones where originally? and b) has anyone attempted a computer/graphic reconstruction of how Stonehenge would look if all the fallen stones presently on site were back in their 'original' positions?
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Littlestone
6th January 2006ce
23:57 |
Restoring Stonehenge (Littlestone, Jan 06, 2006, 23:57)- Re: Restoring Stonehenge (FourWinds, Jan 07, 2006, 00:16)
- Re: Restoring Stonehenge (Littlestone, Jan 18, 2006, 20:33)
- Re: Restoring Stonehenge (cropredy, Jan 20, 2006, 23:58)
- Re: Restoring Stonehenge (The Eternal, Jan 21, 2006, 00:13)
- Re: Restoring Stonehenge (Littlestone, Jan 22, 2006, 00:19)
|
|
Head To Head 
Top of page