Forums | Re: dead and buried? – The Modern Antiquarian.com

The Modern Antiquarian

Home	Latest Posts	Forums	Maps	Help

Browse Sites	News	Blog	Contributors	The Books

Head To Head

The Modern Antiquarian

Avebury Forum

Start a topic | Search

Avebury

Re: dead and buried?

72 messages

Select a forum:

Yeh - no doubt!

And I bet your watertight theory has somewhat less than 600 people involved, am I right?

I'm afraid, Mike, that given the evidence - I think Gordon's more on the right lines here...

I've seen photos and film footage AND taken part in the experiments! I can SHOW you photos and televisual footage! How does that compare to your evidence? Sorry to sound smug, and all that... ;o)

G x

Reply | with quote

Posted by goffik
27th October 2005ce
19:28

In reply to:

Re: dead and buried? (mike croley)

Messages in this topic:

dead and buried?

(tuesday, Oct 24, 2005, 22:19)

Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 24, 2005, 22:45)
- Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 24, 2005, 23:17)
  - Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 24, 2005, 23:24)
    - Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 24, 2005, 23:39)
      - Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 25, 2005, 00:00)
        Re: dead and buried? (PeterH, Oct 25, 2005, 08:43)
        Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 25, 2005, 12:59)
        Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 25, 2005, 14:34)
- Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 25, 2005, 09:27)
  - Re: dead and buried? (dee, Oct 25, 2005, 14:14)
  - Re: dead and buried? (PeterH, Oct 25, 2005, 14:45)
    - Re: dead and buried? (moss, Oct 25, 2005, 15:21)
    - Re: dead and buried? (BuckyE, Oct 25, 2005, 16:07)
    - Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 26, 2005, 07:29)
      - Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 26, 2005, 07:32)
  - Re: dead and buried? (tuesday, Oct 25, 2005, 15:07)
    - Re: dead and buried? (PeterH, Oct 25, 2005, 15:12)
      - Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 26, 2005, 15:34)
        Re: dead and buried? (PeterH, Oct 26, 2005, 18:37)
        Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 27, 2005, 07:10)
        Re: dead and buried? (BrigantesNation, Oct 27, 2005, 11:57)
        Re: dead and buried? (nigelswift, Oct 27, 2005, 12:17)
        Re: dead and buried? (Moth, Oct 27, 2005, 13:06)
        Re: dead and buried? (PeterH, Oct 27, 2005, 14:26)
        Re: dead and buried? (daveyravey, Oct 27, 2005, 17:25)
        Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 27, 2005, 17:01)
        Re: dead and buried? (PeterH, Oct 27, 2005, 12:49)
        Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 27, 2005, 14:21)
        Re: dead and buried? (PeterH, Oct 27, 2005, 14:29)
        Re: dead and buried? (mike croley, Oct 27, 2005, 18:09)
        Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 27, 2005, 17:02)
  - Re: dead and buried? (Kammer, Oct 25, 2005, 16:37)
    - Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 26, 2005, 07:44)
      - Re: dead and buried? (Rhiannon, Oct 26, 2005, 09:38)
        Re: dead and buried? (nigelswift, Oct 26, 2005, 11:36)
        Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 26, 2005, 12:00)
        Re: dead and buried? holy megalithomaniac (tuesday, Oct 26, 2005, 12:24)
        Re: dead and buried? holy megalithomaniac (FourWinds, Oct 26, 2005, 12:51)
        Re: dead and buried? (moss, Oct 26, 2005, 16:45)
        Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 26, 2005, 16:49)
      - Re: dead and buried? (Kammer, Oct 26, 2005, 10:21)
        Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 26, 2005, 12:59)
        Re: dead and buried? (mike croley, Oct 26, 2005, 19:39)
        Re: dead and buried? (Kammer, Oct 27, 2005, 07:15)
        Re: dead and buried? (mike croley, Oct 27, 2005, 19:20)
      - Re: dead and buried? (tuesday, Oct 26, 2005, 11:17)
        Re: dead and buried? (FourWinds, Oct 26, 2005, 12:55)
      - Re: dead and buried? (tuesday, Oct 26, 2005, 11:17)
  - Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 25, 2005, 17:42)
    - Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 26, 2005, 00:34)
  - Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 26, 2005, 15:43)
    - Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 26, 2005, 17:02)
  - Re: dead and buried? (doktoratomik, Oct 30, 2005, 19:02)
    - Re: dead and buried? (mike croley, Oct 30, 2005, 20:36)
- Re: dead and buried? (nigelswift, Oct 25, 2005, 14:20)
  - Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 25, 2005, 14:39)
    - Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 25, 2005, 22:49)
      - Re: dead and buried? (Littlestone, Oct 25, 2005, 23:03)
Re: dead and buried? (smallblueplanet, Oct 25, 2005, 20:01)
- Re: dead and buried? (GordonP, Oct 26, 2005, 18:44)
  - Re: dead and buried? (Rowan_1, Oct 27, 2005, 02:02)
    - Re: dead and buried? (GordonP, Oct 27, 2005, 18:17)
      - Re: dead and buried? (mike croley, Oct 27, 2005, 19:24)
        Re: dead and buried? (goffik, Oct 27, 2005, 19:28)
  - Re: dead and buried? (VenerableBottyBurp, Oct 27, 2005, 17:11)
Knackers ... (StoneLifter, Oct 26, 2005, 19:30)
- Increasing the conundrum (Littlestone, Oct 26, 2005, 20:16)
  - Re: Increasing the conundrum (Pilgrim, Oct 26, 2005, 20:39)
    - Re: Increasing the conundrum (Littlestone, Oct 26, 2005, 21:40)
      - Re: Increasing the conundrum (Pilgrim, Oct 26, 2005, 23:36)
        Re: Increasing the conundrum (Littlestone, Oct 26, 2005, 23:57)

Terms & Conditions | Home | Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Top of page