>As long as Silbury gets fixed I'm happy. Demanding info on every decision will just delay things further and put Silbury in more danger as more people clamber all over it and those inner voids migrate upwards.<
Unpalatable though it might be (not being given all the info by EH) I agree that things are getting desperate and delays are only exacerbating the danger of further collapses. I accept that those delays are mainly due to EH not acting sooner and I commend Nigel and others for badgering them at every opportunity. Things however are now getting critical and I was horrified to see how the summit had slumped when I saw Silbury last week. The slump is clearly visible in Photobabe's recently posted (and beautiful) photo at -
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/39295
Compare the collapsing summit with Holy's photo taken in December 2001 (I think from the same direction though closer) -
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/39295
We've got to start pulling together on this before it really does become too late.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Littlestone 20th August 2005ce 12:59 |
Vote for Silbury! (Jane, Aug 16, 2005, 16:05)- Re: Vote for Silbury! (texlahoma, Aug 16, 2005, 17:14)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (goffik, Aug 16, 2005, 17:23)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (PeterH, Aug 16, 2005, 17:33)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (nigelswift, Aug 16, 2005, 21:26)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (FourWinds, Aug 16, 2005, 21:56)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (mike croley, Aug 16, 2005, 22:52)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (nigelswift, Aug 16, 2005, 22:57)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (goffik, Aug 17, 2005, 08:04)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (nigelswift, Aug 17, 2005, 08:24)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (goffik, Aug 17, 2005, 13:07)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (Moth, Aug 17, 2005, 13:11)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (mike croley, Aug 17, 2005, 21:35)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (mike croley, Aug 17, 2005, 21:41)
- Re: Vote for Silbury NOW !!! (mike croley, Aug 17, 2005, 21:54)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Grendel, Aug 16, 2005, 21:36)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (FourWinds, Aug 16, 2005, 21:52)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! & Thornborough :-) (Rockrich, Aug 16, 2005, 22:09)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (daveyravey, Aug 16, 2005, 22:26)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Littlestone, Aug 17, 2005, 08:32)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Wiggy, Aug 17, 2005, 14:20)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (anthonyqkiernan, Aug 17, 2005, 14:26)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Jane, Aug 17, 2005, 14:45)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Moth, Aug 17, 2005, 14:47)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Wiggy, Aug 17, 2005, 14:56)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Nat, Aug 17, 2005, 15:23)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Littlestone, Aug 17, 2005, 19:45)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (third degree, Aug 17, 2005, 20:52)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Littlestone, Aug 19, 2005, 10:48)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Jane, Aug 19, 2005, 14:20)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (nigelswift, Aug 19, 2005, 14:38)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Littlestone, Aug 19, 2005, 18:59)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (nigelswift, Aug 19, 2005, 19:41)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Littlestone, Aug 19, 2005, 21:29)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Littlestone, Aug 19, 2005, 21:37)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (nigelswift, Aug 20, 2005, 07:31)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Ishmael, Aug 20, 2005, 11:11)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Jane, Aug 20, 2005, 12:08)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Ishmael, Aug 20, 2005, 12:19)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Littlestone, Aug 20, 2005, 12:59)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (nigelswift, Aug 20, 2005, 12:46)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (mike croley, Aug 20, 2005, 13:33)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (mike croley, Aug 19, 2005, 23:11)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (mike croley, Aug 19, 2005, 23:06)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Moth, Aug 19, 2005, 14:37)
- Re: Vote for Silbury! (Ike, Aug 19, 2005, 21:36)
|
|