> By the by in your previous post what did you mean by idiots?
Well... idiots! 'Paganism' (in as far as such a blanket term has any real meaning) attracts all kinds, including its share of idiots. Which is one reason why I feel that any reference to 'pagans' that seeks to generalise is pretty much doomed to failure.
Reply | with quote | Posted by doktoratomik 20th July 2005ce 13:17 |
No topic. (AveburyDeviant, Jul 18, 2005, 15:43)- Re: No topic. (Kammer, Jul 18, 2005, 16:13)
- Re: No topic. (doktoratomik, Jul 18, 2005, 16:17)
- Re: No topic. (Kammer, Jul 18, 2005, 17:13)
- Re: No topic. (doktoratomik, Jul 18, 2005, 17:46)
- Re: No topic. (juamei, Jul 18, 2005, 20:28)
- Re: No topic. (baza, Jul 18, 2005, 20:47)
- Re: No topic. (juamei, Jul 19, 2005, 09:18)
- Re: No topic. (AveburyDeviant, Jul 19, 2005, 09:27)
- Re: No topic. (Wiggy, Jul 19, 2005, 09:35)
- Re: No topic. (juamei, Jul 19, 2005, 09:51)
- Re: No topic. (Ishmael, Jul 19, 2005, 10:58)
- Re: No topic. (mickc, Jul 19, 2005, 11:07)
- Re: No topic. (doktoratomik, Jul 19, 2005, 11:52)
- Re: No topic. (AveburyDeviant, Jul 19, 2005, 15:57)
- Re: No topic. (lemon, Jul 19, 2005, 16:49)
- Re: No topic. (doktoratomik, Jul 19, 2005, 17:03)
- Re: No topic. (lemon, Jul 19, 2005, 17:17)
- Re: No topic. (doktoratomik, Jul 19, 2005, 17:20)
- Re: No topic. (lemon, Jul 19, 2005, 17:32)
- Re: No topic. (doktoratomik, Jul 19, 2005, 17:39)
- Re: No topic. (AveburyDeviant, Jul 20, 2005, 10:51)
- Re: No topic. (doktoratomik, Jul 20, 2005, 12:29)
- Re: No topic. (lemon, Jul 20, 2005, 12:34)
- Re: No topic. (AveburyDeviant, Jul 20, 2005, 12:51)
- Re: No topic. (doktoratomik, Jul 20, 2005, 13:17)
- Re: No topic. (juamei, Jul 20, 2005, 13:00)
- Re: No topic. (third degree, Jul 19, 2005, 17:19)
- Local tv (Ishmael, Jul 20, 2005, 13:54)
- Re: No topic. (Joolz, Jul 20, 2005, 15:00)
- Re: No topic. (scousemaiden, Jul 24, 2005, 16:45)
- Re: No topic. (Joolz, Jul 25, 2005, 18:42)
|
|