Oops. I meant part 1.
In pt 2, I thought the 're-enactment' & the blessing were a bit pants, but most of the rest was OK/good, tho not exactly ground-breaking.
But then did it claim to be promoting new theories etc? (Plus I guess a lot of peeps here know a lot more about Stonehenge & prehistoric folk than most viewers.)
love
Moth
This topic is locked | Posted by Moth 23rd June 2005ce 00:34 |
FOAMHENGE (mike croley, Jun 22, 2005, 18:25)- Re: FOAMHENGE (CianMcLiam, Jun 22, 2005, 18:31)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (hamish, Jun 22, 2005, 20:21)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Lubin, Jun 22, 2005, 20:28)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Jane, Jun 22, 2005, 20:40)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Pilgrim, Jun 22, 2005, 21:49)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Lubin, Jun 22, 2005, 22:09)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Moth, Jun 22, 2005, 22:15)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (smallblueplanet, Jun 22, 2005, 22:19)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Lubin, Jun 22, 2005, 22:37)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (smallblueplanet, Jun 22, 2005, 22:43)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Littlestone, Jun 22, 2005, 23:10)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Moth, Jun 23, 2005, 00:28)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Moth, Jun 23, 2005, 00:34)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Lubin, Jun 25, 2005, 13:29)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (Cursuswalker, Jun 22, 2005, 23:18)
- Re: FOAMHENGE (goffik, Jun 23, 2005, 08:06)
- Anybody want a foamhenge (RombaldII, Jun 23, 2005, 11:17)
- Jane (nigelswift, Jun 24, 2005, 19:32)
- Re: Jane (Jane, Jun 24, 2005, 20:30)
- Re: Jane (mike croley, Jun 24, 2005, 20:38)
- Trolling (Steve Gray, Jun 25, 2005, 00:55)
|
|