Because chalk doesn't desolve in water and so will not wash off (even if done in a place where it's exposed to the elements). Removing it necessitates an abrasive procedure. Also, it's alkaline and disturbs the natural balance in which the resident lichens thrive. Also, it looks bloody ugly and other folks don't want to have their experiences at the stones ruined by someone's doodles, which makes it a very, very selfish act and the perp a very selfish and inconsiderate person - just like leaving assorted offerings and candles (i.e. litter!) at sites.
That's what's wrong with it. I'm sure there's otherreasons that make it wrong too, but any one of the above should be enough in its own right.
This topic is locked | Posted by FourWinds 30th March 2005ce 06:50 |
Graffiti at WKLB. (jimit, Mar 29, 2005, 11:18)- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (PMM, Mar 29, 2005, 11:56)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (doktoratomik, Mar 29, 2005, 12:47)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (andygreyweather, Mar 29, 2005, 14:01)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (mike croley, Mar 29, 2005, 17:34)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Pete G, Mar 29, 2005, 17:38)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (LancsLass, Mar 29, 2005, 23:00)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (FourWinds, Mar 30, 2005, 06:50)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (mike croley, Apr 02, 2005, 11:12)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (nigelswift, Apr 02, 2005, 12:06)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (goffik, Apr 04, 2005, 18:40)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (mike croley, Apr 04, 2005, 19:04)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Jane, Apr 04, 2005, 19:57)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Pete G, Apr 04, 2005, 20:28)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (mike croley, Apr 04, 2005, 23:45)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Pete G, Apr 04, 2005, 23:50)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Jane, Apr 05, 2005, 09:11)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Kammer, Apr 05, 2005, 09:38)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Wiggy, Apr 05, 2005, 10:24)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Wiggy, Apr 05, 2005, 10:29)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (goffik, Apr 05, 2005, 10:47)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (wolfnighthunter, Apr 05, 2005, 19:48)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (mike croley, Apr 05, 2005, 22:10)
- shorty! (Pete G, Apr 06, 2005, 01:44)
- Reclaiming unacceptable symbols (goffik, Apr 06, 2005, 07:56)
- Re: Reclaiming unacceptable symbols (morfe, Apr 06, 2005, 09:24)
- Re: Reclaiming unacceptable symbols (mike croley, Apr 06, 2005, 10:13)
- Re: Reclaiming unacceptable symbols (morfe, Apr 06, 2005, 11:15)
- Re: Reclaiming unacceptable symbols (cameltoe, Apr 06, 2005, 11:17)
- Re: Reclaiming unacceptable symbols (Squid Tempest, Apr 06, 2005, 12:14)
- Re: Reclaiming unacceptable symbols (goffik, Apr 06, 2005, 12:34)
- Re: Reclaiming unacceptable symbols (Wiggy, Apr 06, 2005, 12:38)
- Re: Reclaiming unacceptable symbols (anthonyqkiernan, Apr 06, 2005, 10:32)
- Re: You're Creepy, Mr Croley! (follow that cow, Apr 06, 2005, 14:05)
- Re: You're Creepy, Mr Croley! (mike croley, Apr 06, 2005, 14:17)
- Re: You're Creepy, Mr Croley! (rocknicker, Apr 06, 2005, 14:46)
- Re: You're Creepy, Mr Croley! (jimit, Apr 06, 2005, 18:10)
- I really AM showing my ignorance now, but... (goffik, Apr 07, 2005, 07:30)
- Re: I really AM showing my ignorance now, but... (FourWinds, Apr 07, 2005, 07:30)
- Re: I really AM showing my ignorance now, but... (Blonde, Apr 07, 2005, 17:31)
- Re: I really AM showing my ignorance now, but... (doktoratomik, Apr 07, 2005, 20:00)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Wiggy, Apr 07, 2005, 08:52)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Wiggy, Apr 07, 2005, 11:09)
- Re: Graffiti at WKLB. (Moth, Apr 07, 2005, 17:27)
- An out-of the-way ornament (Littlestone, Apr 07, 2005, 23:09)
|
|