Hi and welcome to TMA
>> It can't just be me that thinks that this has to be more than coincidence, surely
Draw a circle. Put three points in one quadrant of its circumference. Remove the circle. You are left with two points in a straight line and one slightly off it. It's not this feature that can used as concrete evidence of an Orion's Belt link. You have to have the distances apart proportional too, which <i>seems</i> to be the case at Thornborough.
The post holes at Stonehenge could be a bit of a timber post circle, which I find more interesting than and Orion connection. It would throw the circular use of the site back a long way in time. To put cream on it a nice outlying post marking the Summer Solstice sunrise would be nice :-)
 Reply | with quote | Posted by FourWinds
19th January 2005ce
07:12 |
stonehenge mesolithic post holes (Treeman, Dec 26, 2004, 02:59)- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (Treeman, Dec 26, 2004, 03:03)
- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (moss, Dec 26, 2004, 14:13)
- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (smallblueplanet, Dec 26, 2004, 15:02)
- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (fitzcoraldo, Dec 28, 2004, 15:27)
- Orion's belt? (pendant, Jan 18, 2005, 23:35)
- Re: Orion's belt? (FourWinds, Jan 19, 2005, 07:12)
- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (Dave1982, Oct 29, 2014, 17:14)
|
|
Head To Head 
Orion's belt? (pendant)