Im sure many of you would be rather skeptical of the thought of asking somebody to 'psychically' investigating Silbaby..but seeing as 'Dowsing' as already been suggested why not??, there seems to be a large number of folks on this site with who are 'spiritually minded' and somebody should know someone who could visit Silbaby and competently describe the impressions they recieve...
If Derek Acorah can do it in an old Cinema, then why not somebody do the same for that big mound of earth thats soon to dissapear under several hundred ton of shite...
I know the authorities would most probably laugh at any information given by such means but hey, you never know!!!
 Reply | with quote | Posted by paul1970
26th November 2004ce
21:181 reply: Na ! (Pete G) |
Silbaby -a plea. (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 08:25)- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 08:29)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Jane, Nov 23, 2004, 09:08)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 09:16)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (smallblueplanet, Nov 23, 2004, 09:42)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:02)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 16:24)
- Silbaby - a suggestion. (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 17:16)
- More evidence? (ocifant, Nov 23, 2004, 20:55)
- West Kennett enclosures (Rhiannon, Nov 25, 2004, 13:57)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (BrigantesNation, Nov 26, 2004, 15:20)
- Council reply (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 16:09)
- Re: Council reply (nigelswift, Nov 26, 2004, 18:22)
- Re: Council reply (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 19:03)
- Time to call in the psychic detective??? (paul1970, Nov 26, 2004, 21:18)
- Na ! (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 21:36)
- Re: Council reply (Grendel, Nov 28, 2004, 10:31)
- Re: Council reply (BrigantesNation, Nov 29, 2004, 11:37)
- Re WK palisaded enclosures (moss, Nov 28, 2004, 07:32)
|
|
Re: Council reply (Pete G)