If the Council are like most councils they will try everything to avoid removing the fly tipping if it is on private land.
Looking at the material in jimit's picture it looks like bricks. The best way to remove these would be by JCB (but that would then need a wagon) or by using a crane mounted on a wagon. Either method may damage the site.
Of course if the site is not scheduled then the only legal recourse I would guess would be criminal damage but the Council would only remove the fly tipping with the permission of the landowner. The Council then have a statutory defence to criminal damage.
Grimly,
G
Reply | with quote | Posted by Grendel 25th November 2004ce 18:18 |
Silbaby -a plea. (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 08:25)- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 08:29)
- Re: Silbaby - fly tipping (Grendel, Nov 25, 2004, 18:18)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Jane, Nov 23, 2004, 09:08)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 09:16)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (smallblueplanet, Nov 23, 2004, 09:42)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:02)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 16:24)
- Silbaby - a suggestion. (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 17:16)
- More evidence? (ocifant, Nov 23, 2004, 20:55)
- West Kennett enclosures (Rhiannon, Nov 25, 2004, 13:57)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (BrigantesNation, Nov 26, 2004, 15:20)
- Council reply (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 16:09)
- Re WK palisaded enclosures (moss, Nov 28, 2004, 07:32)
|
|