Yes, Waden hides Falkners. I agree that it's safer to speculate in terms of visibility as the simplest and most natural motivation, rather than lines on a map per se. It's easy to get tempted though - e.g. Alan's 2 lines not only meet at Silbaby but do so at a pretty accurate right angle...
I did notice, when on top of Silbaby, that as well as being able to see the other monuments, it provided a sort of grandstand view of WKLB, much clearer than from anywhere else.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
24th November 2004ce
01:04 |
Silbaby -a plea. (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 08:25)- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 08:29)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Jane, Nov 23, 2004, 09:08)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 09:16)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (smallblueplanet, Nov 23, 2004, 09:42)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:02)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 16:24)
- Silbaby - a suggestion. (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 17:16)
- More evidence? (ocifant, Nov 23, 2004, 20:55)
- West Kennett enclosures (Rhiannon, Nov 25, 2004, 13:57)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (BrigantesNation, Nov 26, 2004, 15:20)
- Council reply (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 16:09)
- Re WK palisaded enclosures (moss, Nov 28, 2004, 07:32)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: More evidence? (jimit)