Nigel,
Thanks for putting the new Silbaby site up. Now I know where the blessed thing is! Can I make a couple of suggestions though.
I'd have thought the speech-marks around the site name could be dropped. There are plenty of sites with 'made up' names on TMA without 'em.
Also, you wrote,
"It's not modern, and apparently artificial, but that's as far as it seems safe to go."
I'd have thought...
"It's not thought to be modern, and is apparently artificial (but that's as far as it seems safe to go)."
...might be a safer bet.
K x
Reply | with quote | Posted by Kammer 23rd November 2004ce 17:16 |
Silbaby -a plea. (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 08:25)- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 08:29)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Jane, Nov 23, 2004, 09:08)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 09:16)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (smallblueplanet, Nov 23, 2004, 09:42)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:02)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 16:24)
- Silbaby - a suggestion. (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 17:16)
- More evidence? (ocifant, Nov 23, 2004, 20:55)
- West Kennett enclosures (Rhiannon, Nov 25, 2004, 13:57)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (BrigantesNation, Nov 26, 2004, 15:20)
- Council reply (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 16:09)
- Re WK palisaded enclosures (moss, Nov 28, 2004, 07:32)
|
|