"At least additive vandalism is preferable to subtractive".
I know what you mean, but this is a case where profile is all (if anything) so to see it gradually being piled with concrete blocks and garbage and then vegetation covering it and swallowing it into the original is very upsetting.
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 23rd November 2004ce 15:10 |
Silbaby -a plea. (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 08:25)- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 08:29)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Jane, Nov 23, 2004, 09:08)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 09:16)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (smallblueplanet, Nov 23, 2004, 09:42)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:02)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (Rhiannon, Nov 23, 2004, 10:39)
- Silbaby on TMA (TMA Ed, Nov 23, 2004, 11:55)
- Waden hill (Pete G, Nov 23, 2004, 13:37)
- Re: Waden hill (Moth, Nov 23, 2004, 14:46)
- Re: Waden hill (StoneLifter, Nov 23, 2004, 15:05)
- Re: Waden hill (nigelswift, Nov 23, 2004, 15:10)
- Re: Waden hill (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 16:20)
- Re: Silbaby on TMA (Moth, Nov 23, 2004, 14:34)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (jimit, Nov 23, 2004, 16:24)
- Silbaby - a suggestion. (Kammer, Nov 23, 2004, 17:16)
- More evidence? (ocifant, Nov 23, 2004, 20:55)
- West Kennett enclosures (Rhiannon, Nov 25, 2004, 13:57)
- Re: Silbaby -a plea. (BrigantesNation, Nov 26, 2004, 15:20)
- Council reply (Pete G, Nov 26, 2004, 16:09)
- Re WK palisaded enclosures (moss, Nov 28, 2004, 07:32)
|
|