Perhaps I'm being naiive but is the traffic through avebury really causing that much of a problem to the site? Ok so it's hair raising crossing the road sometimes. And it would be nicer to be able to sit there without hearing the thundering traffic.
But do you want to return Avebury to some mythical no-road state? It has obviously always been a hub of the area. Roads must have crossed it for millennia. Is there something of the 'preservation' 'conservation' issue? - what time period do you want to return it to? Shall we get rid of the houses as well (clearly not, though that's what Keiller did - as well as removing lots of trees).
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Rhiannon
28th June 2004ce
11:44 |
Avebury Bypass (Littlestone, May 27, 2004, 00:13)- Re: Avebury Bypass (Pete G, May 27, 2004, 00:26)
- Re: Avebury Bypass (nigelswift, May 27, 2004, 07:03)
- Re: Avebury Bypass (Pete G, May 27, 2004, 08:46)
- Re: Avebury Bypass (doktoratomik, May 27, 2004, 11:29)
- Re: Avebury Bypass (Ike, May 28, 2004, 17:13)
- Re: Avebury Bypass (Littlestone, May 28, 2004, 21:59)
- Re: Avebury Bypass (Grendel, Jul 05, 2004, 16:42)
- Re: Avebury Bypass (Grendel, Jul 05, 2004, 16:43)
- Bomb Avebury! (fitzcoraldo, Jul 08, 2004, 23:56)
- Well,well.. (neighbourofthedrude, Jul 13, 2004, 09:58)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Avebury Bypass (lemon)