"Implied direct link with modern Pagans..." ???
I'd have thought they have less reason to claim a connection with Stonehenge than almost anywhere else you could think of ... Unique construction, no precursors, no predecessors... so it might have been built by anyone, from anywhere, quite likely people who slaughtered the locals and destroyed their culture.
Also, where could they put this cemetery? Not in the zone of the dead, as it's pure archaeology. But not in the the zone of the living either, since wouldn't that be a blasphemy against the beliefs of the original people? They'll have to go well away, Salisbury perhaps, and create a zone of the Pagan Undead...
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 3rd March 2004ce 17:58 |
New Druid burial site? (Pete G, Mar 02, 2004, 17:36)- Re: New Druid burial site? (juamei, Mar 03, 2004, 10:25)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (Cursuswalker, Mar 03, 2004, 16:14)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (BrigantesNation, Mar 03, 2004, 16:36)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (nigelswift, Mar 03, 2004, 17:58)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (Kozmik_Ken, Mar 05, 2004, 11:47)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (BlueGloves, Mar 05, 2004, 12:00)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (FourWinds, Mar 05, 2004, 12:30)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (ToxicDelerium, Mar 07, 2004, 23:50)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (Pete G, Mar 08, 2004, 00:06)
- Soooo (Pete G, Mar 08, 2004, 00:18)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (FourWinds, Mar 08, 2004, 06:46)
- Finders keepers (nigelswift, Mar 08, 2004, 08:28)
- Re: New Druid burial site? (Pete G, Mar 03, 2004, 18:58)
- Druid for PM? (jimit, Mar 09, 2004, 12:42)
|
|