On the other hand, the map looks highly professional in most ways, a damn sight better than I could do. We don't want to be guilty of Stukeleyism, i.e. saying someone competent has added things, merely because we can't see them now.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
17th December 2003ce
12:17 |
Pete, .... anyone? (nigelswift, Dec 17, 2003, 09:33)- Just an idea... (Moth, Dec 17, 2003, 09:53)
- Re: Just an idea... (Jane, Dec 17, 2003, 10:24)
- Re: Just an idea... (nigelswift, Dec 17, 2003, 10:50)
- Re: Just an idea... (Jane, Dec 17, 2003, 11:16)
- Re: Just an idea... (Moth, Dec 17, 2003, 11:51)
- Re: Just an idea... (nigelswift, Dec 17, 2003, 12:17)
- Re: Just an idea... (Rhiannon, Dec 17, 2003, 11:18)
- Re: Just an idea... (nigelswift, Dec 17, 2003, 11:49)
- Ok (Pete G, Dec 17, 2003, 12:36)
- Re: Ok (nigelswift, Dec 17, 2003, 12:46)
- Re: Ok (ocifant, Dec 17, 2003, 12:50)
- Re: Ok (Pete G, Dec 17, 2003, 12:51)
- Ref:WANHM Vol19 p50 (Pete G, Dec 17, 2003, 13:28)
- Re: Ok (Moth, Dec 17, 2003, 13:37)
- Re: Ok (nigelswift, Dec 17, 2003, 13:48)
- Re: Ok (Pete G, Dec 17, 2003, 17:41)
- Re: Ok (nigelswift, Dec 17, 2003, 18:46)
- Re: Ok (Moth, Dec 18, 2003, 11:30)
- Re: Pete, .... anyone? (ocifant, Dec 17, 2003, 12:32)
- 100 years of flying (Pete G, Dec 17, 2003, 21:31)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Just an idea... (Moth)