It would be a big ask, and an open ended risk to their reputation. It would mean we'd effectively need a corporate identity, editorial control, detailed policies and attitudes to apply to everything that got posted.
It's one way we could go, but I'd have thought a people power platform would be more practicable. Not anarchy, but certainly an open attitude with minimal control. OK, sometimes some of the campaigns we hosted would be defective, but that wouldn't discredit the whole platform, hopefully. Our authority would be that we allowed public concern to be heard, and how can the establishment knock "the public".
It's certainly one of the things we ought to make a choice about, as ES said.
This topic is locked | Posted by nigelswift 5th November 2003ce 19:57 |
Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 07:09)- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 08:39)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 10:22)
- rockulous idea sirrah... (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 15:41)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 15:45)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 15:55)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 15:59)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 16:02)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:08)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 16:15)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:18)
- AHA (morfe, Nov 05, 2003, 16:20)
- AFAH (Jane, Nov 05, 2003, 16:22)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 16:45)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 16:26)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Moth, Nov 05, 2003, 16:29)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Earthstepper, Nov 05, 2003, 16:36)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 05, 2003, 16:36)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 17:39)
- Re: rockulous idea sirrah... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 16:01)
- Here's my best shot... (Kammer, Nov 05, 2003, 16:51)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (ocifant, Nov 05, 2003, 19:02)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 19:57)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 20:01)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 21:01)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (nigelswift, Nov 05, 2003, 21:14)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 21:43)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 21:59)
- DMV (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 22:04)
- Re: DMV (BrigantesNation, Nov 05, 2003, 22:24)
- Oh! (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 06:44)
- Proposed Format, for discussion (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 07:44)
- Re: Proposed Format, for discussion (BrigantesNation, Nov 06, 2003, 09:51)
- Both? (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 10:35)
- Dual identity? (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 09:57)
- Re: Proposed Format, for discussion (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 10:34)
- How about ... (FourWinds, Nov 05, 2003, 20:52)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (wysefool, Nov 05, 2003, 21:08)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Steve Gray, Nov 06, 2003, 08:31)
- Let's settle the name today (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 13:28)
- Re: Let's settle the name today (nickbrand, Nov 06, 2003, 13:38)
- Re: Let's settle the name today (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:11)
- Heritage Action (grrr, Nov 06, 2003, 14:17)
- Re: Heritage Action (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 14:41)
- Re: Heritage Action (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:42)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 14:43)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Kozmik_Ken, Nov 06, 2003, 14:51)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (morfe, Nov 06, 2003, 15:03)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (nigelswift, Nov 06, 2003, 15:04)
- DO NOT GO FOR HAG !!! (FourWinds, Nov 06, 2003, 15:22)
- Re: Heritage Action Group (Earthstepper, Nov 06, 2003, 16:12)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Kammer, Nov 06, 2003, 15:37)
- Re: Getting Serious about Conservation (Moth, Nov 06, 2003, 16:32)
|
|